IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-741289.html

Economic Empowerment and Mental Health: Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Ajinkya Keskar
  • Sulagna Mookerjee

Abstract

We use state-level amendments to inheritance laws in India as a natural experiment to examine the long-term effect of a large-scale women’s empowerment policy on psychological well-being. Exploiting variation in the timing and geography of the Hindu Succession Act Amendment within a difference-in-differences framework, we find that women exposed to the reform exhibit significantly better mental health outcomes in later life. Specifically, the reform reduced the likelihood of depressive symptoms by 5.9–6.4 percentage points and improved a composite mental health index by 0.08σ to 0.093σ. Falsification tests show no effects among individuals from the same state-cohort groups belonging to communities to which the reform did not apply. We document suggestive evidence of improvements in multiple socioeconomic indicators as potential mechanisms for the downstream effects on mental health: treated women are 4.2 percentage points more likely to belong to land-owning households, and treated women report a 0.11σ increase in autonomy. These results highlight the long-term benefits of women’s empowerment policies in improving their mental well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajinkya Keskar & Sulagna Mookerjee, 2026. "Economic Empowerment and Mental Health: Evidence from India," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(1), pages 215-250.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741289
    DOI: 10.1086/741289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741289
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741289
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/741289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.