IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-741288.html

Labor Scarcity and Technology Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence from Rural India during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Kenichi Kuroiwa
  • Prakashan Chellattan Veettil
  • Ishika Gupta

Abstract

This study examines how rice farmers adjust production technology because of negative migrant labor supply shocks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using village-, household-, and plot-level data in rural India, we find that farmers adopt direct seeding of rice (DSR), a labor-saving method, in response to migrant labor scarcity, and that the average profit from DSR is almost the same as that from transplanting rice during the pandemic. We also find that downside risk tends to be higher for the DSR plots due to yield losses caused by weed infestation, and we find suggestive evidence of limited information acquisition about DSR. Our findings highlight the importance of information provision about DSR to improve rice farmers’ adaptive capacity during labor scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenichi Kuroiwa & Prakashan Chellattan Veettil & Ishika Gupta, 2026. "Labor Scarcity and Technology Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence from Rural India during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(1), pages 179-213.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741288
    DOI: 10.1086/741288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741288
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741288
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/741288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.