IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-741162.html

Environmental Regulation, Labor Income Share, and Implications for Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Luo
  • Nan Wu
  • Ming-ang Zhang

Abstract

Despite the growing attention to the inequality effects of environmental regulation, little is known about how these policies affect the distribution of income between labor and capital. This paper addresses the gap by examining the effect of environmental regulation on firms’ labor share and the implications for income inequality. Using the National Specially Monitored Firms program in China as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a regression discontinuity design and find that environmental regulation significantly reduces the labor share of regulated firms by 8.2 percentage points. To explain this finding, we develop a monopolistic competition model where regulated firms adopt clean technologies, increase capital investments, and raise markups, leading to a decline in labor share. Empirical evidence supports the model’s predictions, showing significant increases in capital/labor ratio and markups among regulated firms. Consistent with the decline in labor share, additional analysis based on household survey data reveals a significant rise in income inequality in cities more affected by the policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Luo & Nan Wu & Ming-ang Zhang, 2026. "Environmental Regulation, Labor Income Share, and Implications for Inequality," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(1), pages 133-178.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741162
    DOI: 10.1086/741162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741162
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741162
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/741162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.