IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-741020.html

Foreign Direct Investment and Gender Education Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Rufei Guo
  • Haiji Lin
  • Xin Wang
  • Chaoqun Zhan

Abstract

The gender education gap has been narrowing worldwide in recent decades. In this study, we present the first causal evidence of how foreign direct investment (FDI) affects the gender education gap. By exploiting the quasi-exogenous deregulation of FDI entry in China upon its World Trade Organization accession, we find that prefectures that experienced greater FDI deregulation tend to have a lower gender education gap for the exposed cohorts. This finding is robust to various identification challenges. We identify two key mechanisms: a job-opportunity channel, where female-skill-intensive FDI shifts labor demand toward skilled females, incentivizing female educational investment; and a culture-spillover channel, whereby FDI diffuses gender-equal social norms, reducing son preference and promoting gender equality in education. In addition, FDI deregulation also has a persistent effect on gender equality by empowering women’s careers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rufei Guo & Haiji Lin & Xin Wang & Chaoqun Zhan, 2026. "Foreign Direct Investment and Gender Education Gap," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(1), pages 95-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741020
    DOI: 10.1086/741020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741020
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741020
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/741020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/741020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.