IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-740877.html

Crime-Differential Responses to an Environmental Shock: Evidence from Blackouts

Author

Listed:
  • Patricio Domínguez
  • Pedro Rodriguez-Martinez

Abstract

We examine how criminal activity responds to a large environmental shock in the urban space. We focus on blackouts, which can abruptly change the provision of light and potentially the distribution of criminal opportunities. Using high-frequency administrative data on more than 374,000 power outage incidents reported in Chile during 2014–15, we analyze how they affect crime along several dimensions. We find no significant effect on the aggregate crime rate, but we also find two offsetting reactions driving this result: a positive increase in burglary and a negative effect on robbery. By exploiting unique features of the data, we analyze several dimensions of treatment effect heterogeneity regarding the magnitude, size, and duration of the blackout. In addition, we find that crime responses differ by municipality socioeconomic status. We validate the lack of ambient light as the main mechanism by conducting a set of tests using daytime power outages as a placebo. Our results suggest that criminals react to changes in incentives by carrying out crimes that yield a higher expected return.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricio Domínguez & Pedro Rodriguez-Martinez, 2026. "Crime-Differential Responses to an Environmental Shock: Evidence from Blackouts," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(1), pages 65-93.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/740877
    DOI: 10.1086/740877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740877
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740877
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/740877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/740877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.