IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-739973.html

Land Property Rights and Household Welfare: Evidence from Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Han Li
  • Goytom Abraha Kahsay
  • Wusheng Yu
  • Hao Xia

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of land property rights on rural household welfare and resilience outcomes by using large panel data on the rollout of China’s large-scale land certification program. While the program increases households’ consumption, income, assets, and resilience scores, we find no effects on health outcome (proxied by household expenditure on health and self-reported physical health of the household head). Our heterogeneity analysis suggests that the program increases household consumption and resilience across both male- and female-headed households as well as poor and nonpoor households. We identify agricultural investments, access to credit, land rental market participation, and labor allocation as potential mechanisms through which the land certification program affects household welfare and resilience outcomes. Our findings suggest that land property rights reform could be another effective strategy to alleviate poverty in line with the poverty trap hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Li & Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Wusheng Yu & Hao Xia, 2026. "Land Property Rights and Household Welfare: Evidence from Rural China," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(4), pages 1469-1507.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/739973
    DOI: 10.1086/739973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/739973
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/739973
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/739973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/739973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.