IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-738415.html

COVID-19, Crises, and Women’s Control of Resources: Evidence from Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • José L. Casco

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between crises and the intrahousehold allocation of resources. Using data from Mexico, I estimate a structural collective model to identify the distribution of household resources among its members. Then, I construct a proxy for women’s bargaining power on the basis of their control of resources and document how it evolves over periods of economic stability and contraction. The results indicate that during the COVID-19 crisis, women’s control over household resources declined by approximately 4–5 percentage points compared with non-recession periods and by 6–8 percentage points relative to the financial crisis, with a more pronounced effect for households with children. I further analyze how this resource reallocation affects individual poverty. The findings highlight the heterogeneous behavior of intrahousehold inequality over the business cycle. They also suggest that the hypothesis that the financial crisis was a “man-cession” and the COVID-19 crisis was a “she-cession” holds in terms of intrahousehold resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • José L. Casco, 2026. "COVID-19, Crises, and Women’s Control of Resources: Evidence from Mexico," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(4), pages 1237-1278.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/738415
    DOI: 10.1086/738415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738415
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738415
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/738415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.