IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-736365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Un)Intended Effects of a Teacher Bonus Tournament

Author

Listed:
  • Joniada Milla

Abstract

The current literature on teacher performance pay programs has estimated the ex ante incentive effect by comparing participants with nonparticipants. This is the first study, to my knowledge, that extends the literature by estimating the ex post effect of receiving the pay increase by comparing participant bonus recipients with nonrecipients, which otherwise face identical incentives. I exploit a teacher bonus program in Chile and use a sharp regression discontinuity design to identify a causal effect. Using administrative longitudinal data, I evaluate the effect of two bonus sizes on teacher and student outcomes. I find that the bonus leads to improvements in incentivized standardized scores (used to determine the bonus allocation for the following year) in private schools only. The bonus has no effect on municipal school students’ scores, nonincentivized test scores in any school type, or student sorting. There is only weak suggestive evidence for teacher-retention efforts by winner schools. I also find that the higher bonus size does not have an additional effect above and beyond the lower one. The results have direct policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Joniada Milla, 2026. "(Un)Intended Effects of a Teacher Bonus Tournament," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 491-520.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/736365
    DOI: 10.1086/736365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736365
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736365
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/736365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/736365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.