IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-736139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where Ideas Come From: Experimenting on the “Spirit of Capitalism” in Medieval China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyang Luan
  • Runzhuo Zhai

Abstract

This paper studies the formation of elite ideological preferences by investigating an intellectual competition in China from the tenth to fourteen centuries. We quantify the popularity of Utilitarian Confucianism, an innovative Confucian theory that emphasized economic rationality, against orthodox Confucianism, which upheld moral traditionalism. Our results, including instrumental evidence, show that Utilitarian Confucianism was more popular in regions with higher levels of commercial prosperity. However, the connection was weaker where imperial bureaucracy posed more influence on either the commercial sector or the literati community. These findings point to the ideological consequence of economic activities: different economic sectors can foster ideas that are conducive/detrimental to economic growth, thereby broadening our understanding of externalities. They also highlight the role of institutions in shaping ideology, which we argue helps explain why China followed a more conservative ideological trajectory despite experiencing a medieval commercialization miracle.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyang Luan & Runzhuo Zhai, 2026. "Where Ideas Come From: Experimenting on the “Spirit of Capitalism” in Medieval China," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 455-489.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/736139
    DOI: 10.1086/736139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736139
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736139
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/736139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/736139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.