IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-736134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Endowments and Intrahousehold Distribution of Consumption in India: A Structural Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sutirtha Bandyopadhyay
  • Bipasha Maity

Abstract

Using a collective household model and a recent structural estimation methodology, we estimate how intrahousehold resource shares of individual members vary in India by exogenously varying soil texture. In general, we find that relative to men, women and children have substantially lower access to consumption resources within Indian households. However, the gender gap in resource shares and consequently relative female poverty is found to be substantially lower in households in clayey relative to loamy soil regions. Children’s resource shares are also modestly higher in clayey soil regions, but significant differences in child poverty are not found across soil textures. Because clayey soil has been associated with higher relative female employment and overall gender norms favorable to women, our findings suggest that soil texture also plays an important role in facilitating improvement of relative female bargaining power within households.

Suggested Citation

  • Sutirtha Bandyopadhyay & Bipasha Maity, 2026. "Soil Endowments and Intrahousehold Distribution of Consumption in India: A Structural Approach," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 415-453.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/736134
    DOI: 10.1086/736134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736134
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736134
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/736134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/736134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.