IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-733269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rebuilding Irrigation Infrastructure and Institutions: Evidence from Afghanistan

Author

Listed:
  • Ariel BenYishay
  • Carey Glenn
  • Seth Goodman
  • Rachel Trichler

Abstract

We study the rebuilding of irrigation infrastructure and associations in a postconflict setting, where conflict risks, corruption, and farmer uncertainty can undermine such efforts. To do so, we use satellite measures of crop greenness in the catchment areas around 80 canals and spatiotemporal variation in their rehabilitation. We find sizable gains due to the rebuilding efforts, equal to a 25% improvement in wheat yields. Gains are particularly large in districts seeing reductions in conflict, suggesting investments in irrigation can generate large gains within just a few years, even in areas recovering from violent conflict. In addition, the irrigation association institutions set up under the project did not themselves lead to higher yields, but gains near the start of a canal are not considerably bigger than those near its end and the perimeter’s outlying edges, suggesting that the associations successfully limited water diversion and loss (and in some cases disproportionately benefited the least advantaged farms).

Suggested Citation

  • Ariel BenYishay & Carey Glenn & Seth Goodman & Rachel Trichler, 2025. "Rebuilding Irrigation Infrastructure and Institutions: Evidence from Afghanistan," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(4), pages 1761-1796.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/733269
    DOI: 10.1086/733269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733269
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733269
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/733269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/733269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.