IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-732162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When You Can’t Afford to Wait for a Job: The Role of Time Discounting for Own-Account Workers in Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Thiago Scarelli
  • David N. Margolis

Abstract

Frictional labor markets impose a fundamental trade-off: individuals may work on their own at any time but can take a potentially better-paid wage job only after spending some time looking for it, suggesting that intertemporal considerations affect how people choose their occupation. We formalize this intuition under the job-search framework and show that a sufficiently high subjective discount rate can justify the choice for own-account work even when it pays less than wage work. With this simple model, we estimate the lowest discount rate that is consistent with the occupational choice of urban own-account workers in Brazil. We find that at least 65% of these workers appear to discount the future at rates superior to those available in the formal credit market, which suggests constrained occupational choice. Finally, we show that our estimated lower bound of the time preference is positively associated with food, clothing, and housing deprivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiago Scarelli & David N. Margolis, 2025. "When You Can’t Afford to Wait for a Job: The Role of Time Discounting for Own-Account Workers in Developing Countries," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(4), pages 1605-1657.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/732162
    DOI: 10.1086/732162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732162
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732162
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/732162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/732162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.