IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/amjhec/doi10.1086-738976.html

Kidney Allocation and Patient Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Yeon Choi

Abstract

This study examines how kidney allocation policy shapes both transplant behavior and survival outcomes. Using a fuzzy regression discontinuity design based on the CPRA 80 threshold—a cutoff indicating patients incompatible with most donors, I show that a 10 percentage point increase in deceased donor access reduces reliance on living donor transplants by about 2 percentage points. It also lowers both waitlist and overall mortality. Importantly, these effects are heterogeneous. Substitution is more limited among African American, blood type O, and less-educated candidates, yet their survival outcomes diverge. African American and blood type O patients experience substantial mortality gains, while less-educated candidates exhibit smaller improvements. By jointly analyzing behavioral and survival responses, this study highlights how allocation policy interacts with biological and structural constraints. These findings underscore the need to design kidney allocation systems that promote both equity and effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeon Choi, 2026. "Kidney Allocation and Patient Behavior," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(4), pages 789-813.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:amjhec:doi:10.1086/738976
    DOI: 10.1086/738976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738976
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738976
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:amjhec:doi:10.1086/738976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJHE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.