Deregulation in Australia
In this paper, the various areas where deregulation has, or may, deliver productivity benefits are examined. The direct compliance cost impact of regulation across the Australian economy could be equivalent to more than 5 per cent of GDP each year. Indirect and efficiency costs mean that the total economic cost of regulation is likely to be even greater. To ensure that inappropriate, excessive or unnecessary regulatory costs are not imposed, the author outlines the importance of ensuring that the cost of regulatory cures (compliance costs) are not worse than the disease (the problem that policy makers are trying to solve using regulation). A number of recent policy changes have been designed to support this outcome. Finally, some potential policy areas where deregulatory efforts could be prioritised to deliver productivity and living standards benefits are identified and discussed.
Volume (Year): (2014)
Issue (Month): 2 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +61 2 6263 2111
Fax: +61 2 6273 2614
Web page: http://www.treasury.gov.au
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsy:journl:journl_tsy_er_2014_2_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (The Treasury (Commonwealth of Australia))
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.