IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v2y2002i3p280-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative assessment of three common algorithms for estimating the variance of the area under the nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve

Author

Listed:
  • Mario A. Cleves

    (Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention)

Abstract

The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is often used to summarize and compare the discriminatory accuracy of a diagnostic test or modality,and to evaluate the predictive power of statistical models for binary outcomes. Parametric maximum likelihood methods for Þtting of the ROC curve provide direct estimates of the area under the ROC curve and its variance. Nonparametric methods, on the other hand, provide estimates of the area under the ROC curve, but do not directly estimate its variance. Three algorithms for computing the variance for the area under the nonparametric ROC curve are commonly used, although ambiguity exists about their behavior under diverse study conditions. Using simulated data, we found similar asymptotic performance between these algorithms when the diagnostic test produces results on a continuous scale, but found notable differences in small samples, and when the diagnostic test yields results on a discrete diagnostic scale. Copyright 2002 by Stata Corporation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario A. Cleves, 2002. "Comparative assessment of three common algorithms for estimating the variance of the area under the nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 2(3), pages 280-289, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:2:y:2002:i:3:p:280-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:2:y:2002:i:3:p:280-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.