IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v26y2026i2p153-176.html

Relating latent class membership to covariates and outcomes: Two bias-adjusted methods in Stata

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanbattista Califano

    (University of Naples Federico II)

  • Rosa Fabbricatore

    (University of Naples Federico II)

Abstract

Finite mixture models are versatile tools for modeling unobserved population heterogeneity because they identify latent subgroups within a population from a set of observed variables. A common extension involves linking these classes to covariates or outcomes for further analysis in a stepwise fashion. However, standard methods for this task can introduce bias due to misclassification error when assigning observations to a latent class. In this article, we introduce the step3 command, which implements two bias-adjusted methods—the Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars method and the maximum likelihood approach—that address these issues by accounting for classification uncertainty. We explain the nature of the biases in standard approaches, present the theoretical foundations of these bias-adjusted methods, and provide practical implementation details using step3. Through a simulation study, we illustrate the advantages of these methods in reducing bias and improving estimation accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanbattista Califano & Rosa Fabbricatore, 2026. "Relating latent class membership to covariates and outcomes: Two bias-adjusted methods in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 26(2), pages 153-176, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:153-176
    DOI: 10.1177/1536867X261449931
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj26-2/st0774/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0801
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1536867X261449931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:26:y:2026:i:2:p:153-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.