IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v23y2023i1p3-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

artcat: Sample-size calculation for an ordered categorical outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Ian R. White

    (University College London)

  • Ella Marley-Zagar

    (University College London)

  • Tim P. Morris

    (University College London)

  • Mahesh K. B. Parmar

    (University College London)

  • Patrick Royston

    (University College London)

  • Abdel G. Babiker

    (University College London)

Abstract

We describe a new command, artcat, that calculates sample size or power for a randomized controlled trial or similar experiment with an ordered categorical outcome, where analysis is by the proportional-odds model. artcat implements the method of Whitehead (1993, Statistics in Medicine 12: 2257–2271). We also propose and implement a new method that 1) allows the user to specify a treatment effect that does not obey the proportional-odds assumption, 2) offers greater accuracy for large treatment effects, and 3) allows for noninferiority trials. We illustrate the command and explore the value of an ordered categorical outcome over a binary outcome in various settings. We show by simulation that the methods perform well and that the new method is more accurate than Whitehead’s method.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian R. White & Ella Marley-Zagar & Tim P. Morris & Mahesh K. B. Parmar & Patrick Royston & Abdel G. Babiker, 2023. "artcat: Sample-size calculation for an ordered categorical outcome," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 23(1), pages 3-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:23:y:2023:i:1:p:3-23
    DOI: 10.1177/1536867X231161934
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj23-1/st0700/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1177/1536867X231161934
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1536867X231161934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:23:y:2023:i:1:p:3-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.