IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v17y2017i2p405-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A combined test for a generalized treatment effect in clinical trials with a time-to-event outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Royston

    (MRC Clinical Trials Unit)

Abstract

Most randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome are designed and analyzed assuming proportional hazards of the treatment effect. The sample-size calculation is based on a log-rank test or the equivalent Cox test. Nonproportional hazards are seen increasingly in trials and are recognized as a potential threat to the power of the log-rank test. To address the issue, Roys- ton and Parmar (2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology 16: 16) devised a new “combined test” of the global null hypothesis of identical survival curves in each trial arm. The test, which combines the conventional Cox test with a new formulation, is based on the maximal standardized difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) between the arms. The test statistic is based on evaluations of RMST over several preselected time points. The combined test involves the min- imum p-value across the Cox and RMST-based tests, appropriately standardized to have the correct null distribution. In this article, I outline the combined test and introduce a command, stctest, that implements the combined test. I point the way to additional tools currently under development for power and sample-size calculation for the combined test.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Royston, 2017. "A combined test for a generalized treatment effect in clinical trials with a time-to-event outcome," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 17(2), pages 405-421, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:405-421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0479
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj17-2/st0479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:405-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.