IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v108y2026i2p470-484.html

Regulatory Incentives for Innovation: The FDA's Breakthrough Therapy Designation

Author

Listed:
  • Amitabh Chandra

    (Harvard Business School, Harvard Kennedy School, and NBER)

  • Jennifer Kao

    (UCLA)

  • Kathleen L. Miller

    (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)

  • Ariel D. Stern

    (Harvard Business School, Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science)

Abstract

Regulators of new products confront a trade-off between speeding a product to market and collecting additional product quality information. The FDA's Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) provides an opportunity to understand if regulators can use new policy to innovate around this trade-off. We find that the BTD program shortened clinical development times by 23% and did not affect the ex post safety profile of drugs with the designation. The BTD program had the greatest impact on less experienced firms and reduced clinical trial design complexity. The results suggest that targeted regulatory innovation can shorten R&D periods without compromising product quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Amitabh Chandra & Jennifer Kao & Kathleen L. Miller & Ariel D. Stern, 2026. "Regulatory Incentives for Innovation: The FDA's Breakthrough Therapy Designation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 108(2), pages 470-484, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:108:y:2026:i:2:p:470-484
    DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01434
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/rest_a_01434?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:108:y:2026:i:2:p:470-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.