IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v107y2025i6p1724-1733.html

Heuristics in Self-Evaluation: Evidence from the Centralized College Admission System in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongbin Li

    (Stanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University)

  • Xinyao Qiu

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

Using administrative data on the Chinese National College Entrance Examination, we study how left-digit bias affects college applications. We find strong discontinuities in students' admission outcomes at ten-point thresholds. Students with scores just below multiples of 10 make more conservative college application choices that place them into less selective colleges and majors. In contrast, students who score at or just above multiples of 10 aim at and achieve higher but are at greater risk of overshooting. The discontinuity reveals that despite the educational and labor market consequences, students' self-evaluation based on exam scores is subject to information-processing heuristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongbin Li & Xinyao Qiu, 2025. "Heuristics in Self-Evaluation: Evidence from the Centralized College Admission System in China," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 107(6), pages 1724-1733, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:107:y:2025:i:6:p:1724-1733
    DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01331
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/rest_a_01331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:107:y:2025:i:6:p:1724-1733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.