IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v107y2025i3p845-852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-Quality Seeds, Labor Supply, and Economic Returns: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Erwin Bulte

    (Wageningen University)

  • Savatore Di Falco

    (University of Geneva)

  • Menale Kassie

    (ICIPE, Nairobi)

  • Xavier Vollenweider

    (Flowminder Foundation)

Abstract

Low productivity in agriculture is a major cause of poverty and food insecurity in Africa. One explanation for low productivity is the widespread presence of low-quality inputs on local markets (“lemon technologies”), which causes uncertainty among farmers and erodes incentives for adoption. We report the results from a field experiment in Tanzania to study the impact of improved maize seeds in a context where we exogenously vary seed quality and uncertainty about seed type. The analysis is at the level of experimental plots owned and managed by farmers (not the entire farm). While improved seed positively affects harvests and reduces the probability of crop failure among fully informed farmers, these benefits are attenuated significantly when farmers are uncertain about the seed type they receive. The main channel linking uncertainty to lower harvest levels is the reallocation of labor—a complementary input. The presence of lemon inputs on the market for modern inputs impedes learning about the profitability of these inputs and increases the yield gap by slowing adoption in subsequent periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Erwin Bulte & Savatore Di Falco & Menale Kassie & Xavier Vollenweider, 2025. "Low-Quality Seeds, Labor Supply, and Economic Returns: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 107(3), pages 845-852, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:107:y:2025:i:3:p:845-852
    DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01285
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/rest_a_01285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:107:y:2025:i:3:p:845-852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.