IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Model, Old Barriers: Remaining Challenges to African Civil Society Participation


  • Philipp Schmidt


African civil society representation in the process leading up to WSIS, and at the Geneva meeting itself, did not elicit the impact expected by some and hoped for by most.Looking closely at the reasons why could inspire solutions for next time, in particular as attention turns to the Tunis meeting in 2005.Problems and hurdles were many, and there was no single point of failure.However, one underlying factor exacerbated many others:the various actors did not understand what was really needed for ground-level representatives to participate effectively in an international policy meeting.On one side, the international organizers communicated the importance of civil society groups and called on them to participate, but they failed to recognize that those most suited to contribute-especially in Africa-did not have the financial and other resources needed to participate effectively.On the other side, African civil society did not deliver enough of the kind of input that WSIS insiders could use to leverage change.Overall, they lacked coordination and failed to build consensus on many topics.And once representatives got to the meeting, many were not well informed enough to effectively influence discussions-not only in the "big rooms," but more importantly, in the many smaller venues and corridors where unscheduled opportunities arose for direct interaction with decision makers. (c) 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Internationl Development.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Schmidt, 2004. "New Model, Old Barriers: Remaining Challenges to African Civil Society Participation," Information Technologies and International Development, MIT Press, vol. 1(3-4), pages 100-103, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:itintd:v:1:y:2004:i:3-4:p:100-103

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:itintd:v:1:y:2004:i:3-4:p:100-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kristin Waites). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.