IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v26y2026i3p157-166.html

Remaking the Amazon? The Emergence of Transterritorial Spaces of Governmentality

Author

Listed:
  • M. Cecilia Oliveira

Abstract

Since the Paris Agreement, the Amazon has been reimagined not merely as a sovereign territory but as a critical “body” of planetary physiology. This Forum article argues that this shift represents the emergence of the Amazon as a “transterritorial space”—a zone governed by transnational flows of capital, data, and carbon metrics that override local knowledge, modes of life, and conflicts. Drawing on the work of political scientist Edson Passetti and Caribbean scholar Katherine McKittrick, I analyze how the region and its environments are being governmentalized. I propose that current climate governance functions as a rationality that reduces the Amazon to a monoculture of carbon sequestration for the benefit of global elites and capitalist mechanisms in the North and the South. As evidenced by the outcomes of the thirtieth Conference of the Parties, the danger lies in the preservation of structures crucial for the continuity of fossil fuel exploration and the proliferation of market-oriented mechanisms. These mechanisms frequently ignore urgent scientific alerts regarding deforestation, while local knowledge is legitimized only when forced to fit within the dominant rationalities underpinning global climate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Cecilia Oliveira, 2026. "Remaking the Amazon? The Emergence of Transterritorial Spaces of Governmentality," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 26(3), pages 157-166, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:26:y:2026:i:3:p:157-166
    DOI: 10.1162/GLEP.a.786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP.a.786
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/GLEP.a.786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:26:y:2026:i:3:p:157-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.