IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v25y2025i3p78-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

REDD+ and Extractivism: Navigating Sustainability in Ghana’s Cocoa Landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Wahabu

Abstract

REDD+ is a global green vision that addresses climate change by reducing emissions from deforestation and enhancing carbon storage in forests while promoting sustainable forest management. Despite the implementation of REDD+ interventions in Ghana’s cocoa forests, extractivist forest practices persist. Based on official documents, interviews, and participatory observation, this article analyzes and explains the coexistence of forest-based extractivism with REDD+ in one of Ghana’s flagship REDD+ project areas. The findings show that REDD+ interventions designed for cocoa forests are not only inadequately equipped to halt Ghana’s forest-based extractivist development path but also insufficiently address the dispossession of local communities who find themselves deprived of their management and forest access rights and thus powerless to protect and restore the forest. The article argues that the carbon-based greening of the cocoa sector under REDD+ opens a new frontier for transnational accumulation while simultaneously reinforcing the legacy of extractive capitalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Wahabu, 2025. "REDD+ and Extractivism: Navigating Sustainability in Ghana’s Cocoa Landscapes," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 25(3), pages 78-99, Summer.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:78-99
    DOI: 10.1162/glep.a.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.10
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep.a.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:78-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.