IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v25y2025i3p55-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rights of Nature and World Order: Reimagining Socioecological Futures

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Espinosa
  • Fabricio Rodríguez

Abstract

Rights of Nature (RoN) have emerged as a transformative strategy to address contemporary socioecological crises. Over the past two decades, RoN have gained traction as national laws and court rulings have increasingly recognized ecosystems as legal entities, capturing global interest. While existing research explores RoN across jurisdictions, their potential to contest dominant world orders—rooted in Western, anthropocentric, and capitalist logics—remains underexamined. This article investigates how RoN both disrupt and coexist with these hegemonic frameworks by foregrounding socioecological interdependence over commodification. Drawing on critical theory, relational international relations, sociotechnical imaginaries, and Indigenous cosmovisions, we focus on Ecuador’s pioneering constitutional framework and emblematic court cases, including Los Cedros. We show how RoN challenge the extractivist foundations of liberal Westphalian state sovereignty and empower legal actions beyond human-centered rights. Yet tensions arise as RoN are becoming institutionalized through technocratic and scientific logics that risk marginalizing nonscientific knowledge systems. The Ecuadorian experience with RoN reveals ambivalences: they enable imaginaries of plural socioecological futures while remaining entangled with the epistemic, legal, and political structures they seek to transform.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Espinosa & Fabricio Rodríguez, 2025. "Rights of Nature and World Order: Reimagining Socioecological Futures," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 25(3), pages 55-77, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:55-77
    DOI: 10.1162/glep.a.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.6
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep.a.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:55-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.