IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v25y2025i3p11-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Global Politics of a Protected Earth

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Alger
  • Peter Dauvergne

Abstract

The vision of humans living sustainably on a “protected earth” has a long history. Support for this vision has been surging in recent years, coming into sharp relief in 2022 when negotiators at the Convention on Biological Diversity’s fifteenth Conference of the Parties set a target of protecting 30 percent of land and sea by 2030. This article explains why this global green vision is gaining power as an ordering principle in world politics. Three sets of factors, we argue, are propelling this vision. First, the base of support is broadening as the conceptualization of the vision increasingly integrates values of justice, equity, Indigenous rights, and community comanagement. Second, grassroots advocacy is steadily strengthening underlying norms of appropriate action for protecting the earth, such as high seas conservation, zero deforestation, and rights of nature. And third, as environmental problems compound and sustainability norms strengthen, a global policy understanding is emerging on the value of legal protections. The extent of protected area looks set to keep rising and even gain pace. We do not assume, however, that the vision of a protected earth is benign, apolitical, or uncontested. Indeed, some states are protecting areas to grab land, control resources, or repress communities, and vast tracts of “protected” land, forests, and oceans remain heavily exploited, both legally and illegally.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Alger & Peter Dauvergne, 2025. "The Global Politics of a Protected Earth," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 25(3), pages 11-32, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:11-32
    DOI: 10.1162/glep.a.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.7
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep.a.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:11-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.