IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v25y2025i2p141-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agriculture at COP27: Antagonistic Political Framing and Fragmentation of Agricultural Issues Within Climate Negotiations and Beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Hrabanski
  • Jean-François Le Coq

Abstract

Despite contributing to 37 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, agriculture has historically been overlooked in international climate negotiations. However, at the 2022 twenty-seventh Conference of the Parties (COP27), agriculture was a focal point of negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, culminating in the Four-Year Sharm El Sheikh Joint Initiative on Implementing Climate Action for Agriculture and Food Security. Despite apparent progress, the direction of this joint action remains notably vague and limited. Based on qualitative research conducted prior to and during COP27 in Sharm El Sheikh, we can attribute this paradox to two main factors. First, competition between four antagonist policy framings obstructs the establishment of a detailed and ambitious institutional agenda within the COP process. Competing players with asymmetrical powers are trying to impose their own framing for addressing climate change issues in agriculture. Second, the fragmentation of the agriculture issue/topic between several regime complexes and within conflicting positions on climate is an obstacle for process bargaining.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Hrabanski & Jean-François Le Coq, 2025. "Agriculture at COP27: Antagonistic Political Framing and Fragmentation of Agricultural Issues Within Climate Negotiations and Beyond," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 25(2), pages 141-164, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:141-164
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00778
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:2:p:141-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.