IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v25y2025i1p46-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postmaterialism and Environmental Protection Revisited: Domestic Plastic Bag Regulations, 1992–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Azusa Uji
  • Jaehyun Song
  • Nives Dolšak
  • Aseem Prakash

Abstract

The postmaterialism hypothesis suggests that wealthy countries are likely to be early adopters of pollution control regulations. Yet, Global South countries have taken the lead in regulating plastic bags. To explain this puzzle, we examine the influence of plastic waste imports on the onset of domestic plastic bag regulations. Processing imported waste creates visible local pollution in the Global South and mobilizes citizens and environmental groups. Because plastic bags are a visible manifestation of the plastic pollution problem, they become focal points for regulatory action. Using a hazard model, our analysis of 133 countries for the 1992–2019 period suggests that plastic waste importers (located in the Global South) are more likely to regulate plastic bags (via fees or bans) earlier, while plastic waste exports are not associated with plastic bag regulation. This article raises broader theoretical issues about domestic policy spillovers of international trade and addresses how trade might unexpectedly activate domestic politics focused on postmaterialist concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Azusa Uji & Jaehyun Song & Nives Dolšak & Aseem Prakash, 2025. "Postmaterialism and Environmental Protection Revisited: Domestic Plastic Bag Regulations, 1992–2019," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 25(1), pages 46-66, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:46-66
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00771
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:46-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.