IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v24y2024i1p100-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging “Enabling Power†Through Awarding in Global Climate Governance: Catalytic Impacts of UNFCCC’s Global Climate Action Award

Author

Listed:
  • Aron Teunissen
  • Sander Chan

Abstract

Successful nonstate climate actions can scale up their efforts and/or have their approaches replicated by others. To strengthen these “catalytic impacts†and their contribution to global mitigation and adaptation efforts, multiple international awarding mechanisms have been established, including Momentum for Change, launched by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). To assess the actual value of awarding mechanisms for fostering catalytic impacts among nonstate climate actions, this article identifies drivers and barriers for catalytic impacts and the extent to which Momentum for Change addresses them, using the concept of enabling power. Research results indicate that only a selective range of drivers and barriers for catalytic impact is actually addressed through Momentum for Change, which mainly strengthens reputation as a driver. Overall, the study demonstrates that the enabling power of Momentum for Change relies on the legitimacy of the UNFCCC in climate governance. However, the extent to which awarding mechanisms help foster catalytic impact is also dependent on an initiative’s individual context, which may affect its ability to capitalize on reputational benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Aron Teunissen & Sander Chan, 2024. "Leveraging “Enabling Power†Through Awarding in Global Climate Governance: Catalytic Impacts of UNFCCC’s Global Climate Action Award," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 24(1), pages 100-123, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:1:p:100-123
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00719
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:1:p:100-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.