Author
Listed:
- Klaus Dingwerth
(Klaus Dingwerth is Assistant Professor of international relations at the University of Bremen, Germany and a Senior Research Fellow with the international Global Governance Project ( glogov.org ). He is the author of the monograph The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy (2007). Recent articles include "Private Transnational Governance and the Developing World: A Comparative Perspective" (International Studies Quarterly 52 (3)); "World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Regulation" (European Journal of International Relations 15 (4), with Philipp Pattberg); and "Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics" (Global Governance 12 (2), with Philipp Pattberg).)
- Margot Eichinger
(Margot Eichinger is a graduate student at the University of Bremen and at the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany.)
Abstract
In this contribution, we explore the tensions that seem inherent in the claim that transparency policies "empower" the users of disclosed information vis-àvis those who are asked to provide the information. Since these tensions are particularly relevant in relation to voluntary disclosure, our analysis focuses on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) as the world's leading voluntary corporate non-financial reporting scheme. Corporate sustainability reporting is often hailed as a powerful instrument to improve the environmental performance of business and to empower societal groups, including consumers, in their relations with the corporate world. Yet, our analysis illustrates that the relationship between transparency and empowerment is conflictual at all four levels of activity examined in this article: in the rhetoric and policies of the GRI as well as in the actual reporting practice and in the activities of intermediaries in response to the organization's disclosure standard. (c) 2010 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Suggested Citation
Klaus Dingwerth & Margot Eichinger, 2010.
"Tamed Transparency: How Information Disclosure under the Global Reporting Initiative Fails to Empower,"
Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(3), pages 74-96, August.
Handle:
RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:10:y:2010:i:3:p:74-96
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:10:y:2010:i:3:p:74-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v10y2010i3p74-96.html
