IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/asiaec/v24y2025i2p23-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remote Work as a Policy Tool for Easing Megacity Overcrowding

Author

Listed:
  • Jihye Kam

    (Department of Social Studies Education Sungshin Women's University)

  • Soohyung Lee

    (Graduate School of International Studies Seoul National University Bank of Korea Global Labor Organization and IZA)

  • Juha Park

    (Samsung Electronics)

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of remote work as a policy tool to alleviate overcrowding in South Korea's metropolitan areas. By analyzing the prevalence of remote work across industries and the industrial composition of workers in various regions, we conduct counterfactual simulations to assess the impact of worker relocation from Seoul and its surrounding areas to other parts of the country. Our findings indicate that if 30 percent of remote work–eligible employees choose to relocate, the share of Seoul and its surrounding areas in total population of the country could decrease from 51 percent to 48 percent—a significantly larger impact than previous policy interventions, which achieved population shifts of less than 0.1 percentage points. These results suggest that remote work may offer a viable and effective strategy for addressing the issue of excessive population concentration in Seoul and its surrounding areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihye Kam & Soohyung Lee & Juha Park, 2025. "Remote Work as a Policy Tool for Easing Megacity Overcrowding," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 24(2), pages 23-51, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:23-51
    DOI: 10.1162/asep_a_00944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00944
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/asep_a_00944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:23-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.