IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/asiaec/v24y2025i2p180-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protectionism of Voters in the Philippines and Thailand: Comparative Approach to the Political Economy of Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Nam Seok Kim

    (Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) Sejong-si, South Korea)

Abstract

This paper studies what determines voters’ attitudes toward protectionist trade policy in the Philippines and Thailand. Using cross-country survey data collected in 2020, I estimate determinants of trade barrier preference in these two Southeast Asian nations. Econometric specifications are based on the Heckscher-Ohlin type factor endowment approach and specific-factor models. Empirical results support that the theoretical predictions made by the factor endowment approach are successful in explaining individual-level protectionism in the two countries: Individuals with higher educational attainment prefer higher trade barriers. However, sector-specific interest predicted by the specific-factor model does not empirically explain the voters’ attitudes toward protectionism in these two Southeast Asian nations. This means that in the Philippines and Thailand, long-run determinants suggested by the factor endowment approach are robust channels, while short-run determinants elaborated by the specific-factor model are not. By applying the comparative approach to seven Asia-Pacific nations, I emphasize distinct features in the Philippines and Thailand, such as the positive marginal effect of educational attainment and gender differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Nam Seok Kim, 2025. "Protectionism of Voters in the Philippines and Thailand: Comparative Approach to the Political Economy of Protection," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 24(2), pages 180-204, Summer.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:180-204
    DOI: 10.1162/asep_a_00956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00956
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/asep_a_00956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:180-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.