IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/the/publsh/3648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative strategic games

Author

Listed:
  • Kohlberg, Elon

    (Harvard Business School)

  • Neyman, Abraham

    (Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality)

Abstract

We present a solution concept, called the value, for n-person strategic games with complete or incomplete information (Bayesian games). The value provides an a priori evaluation of the economic worth of the position of each player; it reflects the players' strategic possibilities, including their ability to selectively share information and to make threats against one another. In the special case of games with complete information the value coincides with a solution developed by Shapley, Nash, and Harsanyi, and in two-person Bayesian games it coincides with a solution developed by Kalai and Kalai. Applications of the value in economics have been rare, at least in part because the existing definition (for $n >2$) consists of an ad hoc scheme that does not easily lend itself to computation. We present a simple formula for computing the value and prove that it is the unique function, from n-player games to n-dimensional vectors of payoffs, that satisfies a short list of desirable properties (axioms).

Suggested Citation

  • Kohlberg, Elon & Neyman, Abraham, 2021. "Cooperative strategic games," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(3), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:the:publsh:3648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econtheory.org/ojs/index.php/te/article/viewFile/20210825/31439/894
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tongseok Lim, 2022. "Cooperative networks and f-Shapley value," Papers 2203.06860, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    2. Justin Chan, 2024. "Implementations of Cooperative Games Under Non-Cooperative Solution Concepts," Papers 2402.14952, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Strategic games; cooperative games; shapley value; nash variables threats; bribery;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:the:publsh:3648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin J. Osborne (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://econtheory.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.