Author
Listed:
- Bahodurova Sulhiya Azizhojaevna
- Akhmedov Usmonjon Khaidarjonovich
- Li Marina Rudolfovna
- Romashkin Roman Anatolyevich
Abstract
In personnel management, the personnel performance assessment system is of particular importance, whichallows to increase the effectiveness of motivation, reduce turnover and increase labor productivity. The personnel managementsystem is defined as the process of proper organization, control and management of human capital. In thisregard, several methods for assessing the performance of personnel have been studied. In the enterprise under study,one of the evaluation methods is already being introduced - this is the KPI method. As a result of studying this method,the shortcomings of this method were revealed. The most important thing is that this method takes into account onlyquantitative indicators of personnel performance. There was a need to find an assessment method that takes into accountthe qualitative indicators of personnel performance. As a result of the analysis, the 360-degree method was chosen. Thereasons for choosing this method are the assessment of quality indicators with the minimization of subjective elementsby evaluating the employee’s activities from all sides: manager, colleagues, subordinate and client. To combine quantitativeand qualitative indicators, it was decided to create a generalized model for assessing the performance of personnel,which will include the results of KPI and 360-degree methods. A generalized model for assessing the performance ofemployees was developed, which includes qualitative and quantitative indicators and has a clear procedure for calculatingthe final assessment based on mathematical calculations.
Suggested Citation
Bahodurova Sulhiya Azizhojaevna & Akhmedov Usmonjon Khaidarjonovich & Li Marina Rudolfovna & Romashkin Roman Anatolyevich, 2023.
"Improving the Efficiency of the Organization Through the use of Innovative Models of Personnel Management,"
GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT, "Ma'rifat-Print-Media" LLC, Tashkent State University of Economics, vol. 1(11), December.
Handle:
RePEc:teu:ged000:v:1:y:2023:i:11:id:593
DOI: 10.55439/GED/vol1_iss11-12/a593
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:teu:ged000:v:1:y:2023:i:11:id:593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Xayrulla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://yashil-iqtisodiyot-taraqqiyot.uz/journal/index.php/GED .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.