IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tei/journl/v18y2025i2p7-21.html

ESG Performance, Financial Pressure, and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Taiwan before and during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu-Yun Tseng

    (Department of Public Finance, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and corporate tax avoidance, and further examines whether financial pressure induced by the COVID-19 pandemic affects firms’ tax avoidance behavior. Using Taiwan as an emerging-market context, this research aims to clarify whether ESG engagement reflects ethical commitment or strategic opportunism. Design/methodology/approach: The study employs panel data from 5,668 firm-year observations of listed and OTC companies in Taiwan between 2017 and 2020. ESG performance is measured using a comprehensive proprietary ESG index constructed from TEJ data, covering environmental, social, and governance dimensions. Corporate tax avoidance is proxied by book–tax differences (BTD) and permanent book–tax differences (PBTD). Multiple regression models, including robustness tests with random-effects models, subsample analyses, and alternative tax avoidance measures, are applied. Findings: The empirical results reveal a significant positive association between ESG performance and corporate tax avoidance, supporting the strategic or opportunistic ESG perspective. All three ESG dimensions—environmental, social, and governance—are positively related to tax avoidance. Moreover, firms exhibited higher levels of tax avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that heightened financial pressure incentivized more aggressive tax planning. Overall, the findings indicate that ESG initiatives may coexist with, rather than constrain, opportunistic financial behavior. Research limitations/implications: This study focuses on Taiwanese listed firms, which may limit the generalizability of the results to other institutional settings. Additionally, while BTD and PBTD are widely used proxies for tax avoidance, they may capture elements beyond intentional tax planning. Future research could incorporate cross-country comparisons, alternative ESG measures, or qualitative analyses to further explore the motivations underlying ESG engagement. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by providing emerging-market evidence on the ESG–tax avoidance relationship and by incorporating the COVID-19 pandemic as an exogenous financial shock. It offers new insights into how financial pressure shapes corporate tax behavior and highlights the potential misuse of ESG practices as a strategic tool rather than a purely ethical commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu-Yun Tseng, 2025. "ESG Performance, Financial Pressure, and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Taiwan before and during COVID-19," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:7-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/docs/volume18_issue2/18_02_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/volume18_issue2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Shuping & Chen, Xia & Cheng, Qiang & Shevlin, Terry, 2010. "Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 41-61, January.
    2. Gupta, Sanjay & Newberry, Kaye, 1997. "Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-34.
    3. Steijvers, Tensie & Niskanen, Mervi, 2014. "Tax aggressiveness in private family firms: An agency perspective," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 347-357.
    4. Richardson, Grant & Lanis, Roman, 2007. "Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 689-704.
    5. Marco Pagano & Paolo F. Volpin, 2005. "The Political Economy of Corporate Governance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1005-1030, September.
    6. Sikka, Prem, 2010. "Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 153-168.
    7. Richardson, Grant & Taylor, Grantley & Lanis, Roman, 2015. "The impact of financial distress on corporate tax avoidance spanning the global financial crisis: Evidence from Australia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 44-53.
    8. Karl V. Lins & Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2017. "Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1785-1824, August.
    9. Mohammed Benlemlih & Jamil Jaballah & Sholom Schochet & Jonathan Peillex, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance: The channel effect of consumer awareness," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 31-60, January.
    10. Ronald W. Masulis & Syed Walid Reza, 2015. "Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(2), pages 592-636.
    11. Mills, LF, 1998. "Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 343-356.
    12. Athira, A. & Ramesh, Vishnu K., 2023. "COVID-19 and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    13. Prem Sikka, 2010. "Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3-4), pages 153-168, September.
    14. Ding, Rong & Sainani, Sushil & (John) Zhang, Ziyang, 2021. "Protection of trade secrets and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 221-232.
    15. John R. Graham, 2000. "How Big Are the Tax Benefits of Debt?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(5), pages 1901-1941, October.
    16. Roman Lanis & Grant Richardson, 2015. "Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 439-457, March.
    17. Mohammed Benlemlih & Jamil Jaballah & Sholom Schochet & Jonathan Peillex, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance: The channel effect of consumer awareness," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-04077729, HAL.
    18. Mohammed Benlemlih & Jamil Jaballah & Sholom Schochet & Jonathan Peillex, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance: The channel effect of consumer awareness," Post-Print hal-04077729, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Menicacci & Lorenzo Simoni, 2024. "Negative media coverage of ESG issues and corporate tax avoidance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(7), pages 1-33, February.
    2. Kovermann, Jost & Velte, Patrick, 2019. "The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance—A literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Khayria Amarna & Maria Victoria López‐Pérez & Raquel Garde Sánchez & Lázaro Rodríguez Ariza, 2025. "ESG Information Disclosure and Its Relationship to Tax Practices: Stakeholder‐Friendly or Legitimacy‐Seeking?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3906-3917, June.
    4. Leung, Sidney C.M. & Richardson, Grant & Taylor, Grantley, 2019. "The effect of the general anti-avoidance rule on corporate tax avoidance in China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 105-117.
    5. Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Rana Jamshed, 2026. "Redefining Purpose: The Effect of the 2019 Business Roundtable Statement on Corporate Tax Strategies," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 914-929, April.
    6. Fallan, Even & Fallan, Lars, 2019. "Corporate tax behaviour and environmental disclosure: Strategic trade-offs across elements of CSR?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    7. Diego Ravenda & Josep Argilés-Bosch & Maika Valencia-Silva, 2015. "Labor Tax Avoidance and Its Determinants: The Case of Mafia Firms in Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 41-62, November.
    8. Kumari Juddoo & Issam Malki & Sudha Mathew & Sheeja Sivaprasad, 2023. "An impact investment strategy," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 177-211, July.
    9. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2020. "Related Party Transactions, State Ownership, the Cost of Corporate Debt, and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Vietnam," OSF Preprints y5qj3, Center for Open Science.
    10. Iftekhar Hasan & Panagiotis Karavitis & Pantelis Kazakis & Woon Sau Leung, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit Shifting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Namryoung Lee, 2018. "R&D Accounting Treatment, R&D State and Tax Avoidance: With a Focus on Biotech Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Ming-Hua Liu & Shaohua Tian & Yang Zhang, 2023. "CEO marital status and corporate tax planning behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1207-1242, November.
    13. Tânia Menezes Montenegro, 2021. "Tax Evasion, Corporate Social Responsibility and National Governance: A Country-Level Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Pedro Ferreira Silva & Cristina Sá & Teresa Eugénio, 2024. "The Influence of Social Responsibility Practices on Tax Planning: An Empirical Study for Companies Listed on Euronext Lisbon," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Kanwal, Zainab & Audi, Marc & Alam, Mehboob, 2025. "Corporate Tax Strategy, Risk, and Long-Term Value Creation: Insights from Technology, Pharmaceutical, and Manufacturing Sectors," MPRA Paper 127563, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Hyejin Cho, 2020. "Sustainable Tax Behavior of MNEs: Effect of International Tax Law Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    17. repec:ami:journl:v:24:y:2024:i:2:p:254-271 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Sarhan, Ahmed A. & Elmagrhi, Mohamed H. & Elkhashen, Emad M., 2024. "Corruption prevention practices and tax avoidance: The moderating effect of corporate board characteristics," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Hanlon, Michelle & Heitzman, Shane, 2010. "A review of tax research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 127-178, December.
    20. Chalevas, Constantinos G. & Doukakis, Leonidas C. & Karampinis, Nikolaos I. & Pavlopoulou, Olga-Chara, 2024. "The impact of family ownership on tax avoidance: International evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    21. Mohammed Benlemlih & Jamil Jaballah & Sholom Schochet & Jonathan Peillex, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance: The channel effect of consumer awareness," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 31-60, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:7-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostas Stergidis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dbikagr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.