IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tei/journl/v18y2025i2p7-21.html

ESG Performance, Financial Pressure, and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Taiwan before and during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu-Yun Tseng

    (Department of Public Finance, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and corporate tax avoidance, and further examines whether financial pressure induced by the COVID-19 pandemic affects firms’ tax avoidance behavior. Using Taiwan as an emerging-market context, this research aims to clarify whether ESG engagement reflects ethical commitment or strategic opportunism. Design/methodology/approach: The study employs panel data from 5,668 firm-year observations of listed and OTC companies in Taiwan between 2017 and 2020. ESG performance is measured using a comprehensive proprietary ESG index constructed from TEJ data, covering environmental, social, and governance dimensions. Corporate tax avoidance is proxied by book–tax differences (BTD) and permanent book–tax differences (PBTD). Multiple regression models, including robustness tests with random-effects models, subsample analyses, and alternative tax avoidance measures, are applied. Findings: The empirical results reveal a significant positive association between ESG performance and corporate tax avoidance, supporting the strategic or opportunistic ESG perspective. All three ESG dimensions—environmental, social, and governance—are positively related to tax avoidance. Moreover, firms exhibited higher levels of tax avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that heightened financial pressure incentivized more aggressive tax planning. Overall, the findings indicate that ESG initiatives may coexist with, rather than constrain, opportunistic financial behavior. Research limitations/implications: This study focuses on Taiwanese listed firms, which may limit the generalizability of the results to other institutional settings. Additionally, while BTD and PBTD are widely used proxies for tax avoidance, they may capture elements beyond intentional tax planning. Future research could incorporate cross-country comparisons, alternative ESG measures, or qualitative analyses to further explore the motivations underlying ESG engagement. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by providing emerging-market evidence on the ESG–tax avoidance relationship and by incorporating the COVID-19 pandemic as an exogenous financial shock. It offers new insights into how financial pressure shapes corporate tax behavior and highlights the potential misuse of ESG practices as a strategic tool rather than a purely ethical commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu-Yun Tseng, 2025. "ESG Performance, Financial Pressure, and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Taiwan before and during COVID-19," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:7-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/docs/volume18_issue2/18_02_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/volume18_issue2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:7-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostas Stergidis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dbikagr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.