Author
Abstract
This study illustrates the risk assessment and analysis which was made as a requirement in the beginning of the project of a stadium.Risks at project are classified into ten items so that it is easy to manage and monitor them. Simple model is adopted in assessing risks such that it is easy to be understood and modified in contrast with the complex models that produce misleading. Sharing, mitigation and accepting risk are strategies adopted in the final assessment. In the case of sharing risks, it is shown that contracting strategy must be based on risk allocation. Inplanning for risk, purpose must be clear as well as responsibilities and this can be shown precisely in a form of Risk Plan. The objective that this study serves is to identify the cost needed for the whole project from the stage of design to the finishing works.This includes all facilities in the stadium like the concrete frames, buildings and so. The study was very important to provide information to the contractor (a private company) and made confidence in that the estimated cost and time needed for achieving the objectives of the project are realistic and based on sound information.The experience gained from previous similar projects was an advantage factor in that most of problems were clear. The most important problem was the likelihood of delay, which, in the worst case will lead to dramatic increasing in costs. Therefore, the assessment of this risk was principal task in the study although it is necessary to take care for all potential risks.The study shows that risks at construction projects carried by many parties found to be changing according to internal or external changes and the change of priorities can be seen by simulating changes in ranking in each case. It is shown also that badly risk communication leads to real problems as in the case of making thought of building the stadium to be late. The cost of the delay which is the primary risk was calculated for each part of the project. For the construction activities, these were assumed to be the overhead. The time costs calculated was in maximum ($ 1,500,000) which is about (10%) of the total cost of the project.
Suggested Citation
Akeel A Husein & Ali Majdi, 2020.
"Assessment of risk management and evaluate the level of risk in construction project: Case Study,"
Technium, Technium Science, vol. 2(1), pages 66-72, January.
Handle:
RePEc:tec:techni:ojs:43
DOI: 10.47577/technium.v2i1.43
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:techni:ojs:43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.