IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/techni/ojs13479.html

Analysis of Visual Evaluation Method and Development of a Digital Inspection Model for State-Owned Building Condition Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Habibie Budi Nurhakim

    (Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia)

  • Aqli Mursadin

    (Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia)

Abstract

The condition assessment of State-Owned Buildings (BGN) by the Banjarmasin City DPUPR currently relies on a manual, paper-based system suffering from two fundamental weaknesses: methodological errors in weighting based on Cost Budget Plans (RAB) and process inefficiencies due to manual handling. This applied research aims to (1) identify essential building components using the Cut-Off Point (COP) method, (2) determine objective importance weights using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and (3) design a functional digital inspection prototype. The study employs an exploratory sequential design. Results indicate that the Structural Component is the most critical criterion with a weight of 48.16%. Field validation demonstrated that the developed digital prototype is 15.38% more time-efficient and yields a more valid damage score (69.51%) compared to the manual system (60.19%), significantly altering the rehabilitation recommendation. This new model provides a more objective and accurate basis for asset management decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Habibie Budi Nurhakim & Aqli Mursadin, 2026. "Analysis of Visual Evaluation Method and Development of a Digital Inspection Model for State-Owned Building Condition Assessment," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 31, pages 109-122, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:techni:ojs:13479
    DOI: 10.47577/technium.v31i.13479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/13479
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/technium.v31i.13479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:techni:ojs:13479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.