IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/techni/ojs10925.html

Naive Bayes Classifier in Grading Carabao Mangoes

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Guillergan

    (Northern Iloilo State University, Batad, Iloilo, Philippines)

  • Reymund Sabay

    (University of Negros Occidental-Recoletos, Bacolod City, Philippines)

  • Joel Bual

    (University of Negros Occidental-Recoletos, Bacolod City, Philippines)

Abstract

This study explores machine learning’s potential to classify carabao mangoes, a key Philippine export, into four grades based on size: A (large), B (medium), C (small), and R (reject). It introduces a Naïve Bayes classification model that uses image processing to extract features for grading. The goal is to create a consistent grading system to enhance export efficiency and benefit local farmers. The research aims to validate the Naïve Bayes model’s accuracy using size, weight, area, and spot ratio. It employs a quantitative, experimental design, manipulating image processing techniques to gauge their impact on classification accuracy. The results show the Naïve Bayes model achieved 95% accuracy, effectively distinguishing large and reject mangoes. It performed well for medium and small mangoes, with a 7% error rate between these classes. This indicates the model’s potential for quality control and sorting, though further refinement is needed to better differentiate between medium and small sizes. In conclusion, the study presents an image processing and Naïve Bayes-based method to classify carabao mangoes by size. The model’s high accuracy suggests its effectiveness and potential for automating mango classification, which could significantly aid the Philippine mango industry. Further performance assessment was conducted using a confusion matrix. The research highlights the promise of this approach for efficient mango grading.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Guillergan & Reymund Sabay & Joel Bual, 2024. "Naive Bayes Classifier in Grading Carabao Mangoes," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 22, pages 14-32, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:techni:ojs:10925
    DOI: 10.47577/technium.v22i.10925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/10925
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/technium.v22i.10925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:techni:ojs:10925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.