IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v39y2023i1p38-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The paradox of organizational learning: lesson learned between constructivism and model simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Andreo Wahyudi Atmoko

    (Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia.)

Abstract

Knowing Organization model ensures organizations can perform better in any environment. This thesis is explored further using ethnometodology to search the characteristics of organizational learning, and using the thesis of two generic structures of system dynamics to find where organizational learning paradox is. Then, through a computer simulation model the paradox impact is simulated. These two methods inspire each other in exploration of the factors affecting organizational learning and their embedded paradox due to the coexistence of reinforcing and balancing causality loop.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreo Wahyudi Atmoko, 2023. "The paradox of organizational learning: lesson learned between constructivism and model simulation," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 39(1), pages 38-47, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:39:y:2023:i:1:p:38-47
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v39i1.8036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8036/2943
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v39i1.8036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational learning;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:39:y:2023:i:1:p:38-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.