IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/ojs13861.html

Effectiveness Of International Institutions Between Great Powers

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Kim

Abstract

International conflicts are rising, and global trade is increasingly strained as the World Trade Organization becomes paralyzed. Great powers have a strong voice in the world and in shaping politics. International courts and organizations do have legal abilities to control disputes, but do not provide equality amongst member states. International disputes are not being resolved because great powers are using their power to their advantage despite the collective decisions presented in these institutions. Geopolitics is becoming a significant factor in how and why institutions behave a certain way when creating resolutions for existing conflicts. Significantly, the effectiveness of international courts and organizations relies on the design and functionality of these institutions, especially when handling great power disputes. Additionally, the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System can learn from different institutional models and decide which to follow to help resolve paralysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Kim, 2026. "Effectiveness Of International Institutions Between Great Powers," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 88(1), pages 239-255, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13861
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v88i1.13861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/13861
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v88i1.13861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tasente Tanase to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.