IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/ojs13480.html

Public Sentiment on Generative AI: Analysis of the Gap between Positive Online Media and Negative Narratives on Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Anggraini

    (LSPR Institute of Communication and Business – Jakarta)

  • Ari S. Widodo

    (LSPR Institute of Communication and Business – Jakarta)

  • Albert

    (LSPR Institute of Communication and Business – Jakarta)

Abstract

This study examines the differences in public sentiment towards generative AI on two different communication platforms: social media and online media. Sentiment analysis from 35,433 discussions on social media showed that 45% of them had negative sentiments, which mainly focused on privacy, data security and ethics issues. In contrast, an analysis of 27,970 articles in online media revealed that 71% of them had positive sentiments, highlighting the potential of generative AI in improving efficiency, creativity, and innovation in sectors such as education and healthcare. This difference confirms how the characteristics of the platform affect public perception. The findings have important implications for policymakers and technology development. Addressing public concerns through strong AI regulation and developing inclusive communication strategies is essential to bridging the sentiment gap. A balanced Naras can increase public literacy and trust in generative AI, encouraging responsible technology adoption. By expanding the scope of the analysis, further studies can provide evidence-based insights to support decision-making in technology governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Anggraini & Ari S. Widodo & Albert, 2026. "Public Sentiment on Generative AI: Analysis of the Gap between Positive Online Media and Negative Narratives on Social Media," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 79(1), pages 386-400, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13480
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v79i1.13480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/13480
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v79i1.13480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tasente Tanase to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.