Author
Listed:
- Prayogo Laksono
(Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)
- Made Warka
(Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)
- Frans Simangungsong
(Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)
Abstract
The Republic of Indonesia is a constitutional state (rechtsstaat), which means that all attitudes, behaviors, and actions, whether carried out by the authorities or by its citizens, must be based on the law. Indonesia as a constitutional state is affirmed in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Basically, a constitutional state aims primarily to provide legal protection for the people. Philipus M Hadjon states that legal protection for the people against government actions is based on two principles, namely the principle of human rights and the principle of the constitutional state. This research uses a normative juridical research type. The construction of restorative justice arrangements in the integrated criminal justice system is necessary because all criminal cases resolved under the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code must be resolved through the integrated criminal justice system via law enforcement officials so that dispute resolutions involving the community, which are recognized and developed within the community, do not receive facilities under the old Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code, even though the application of restorative justice provisions in the Criminal Code has been included in the provisions of Article 54 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.The application of restorative justice provisions in the Criminal Code is stipulated in Article 54 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code Criminal Law Code, the provisions still have weaknesses in that there is no specific law regulating the restorative justice mechanism, so that the resolution of cases through this approach does not yet have a strong legal basis, which can lead to legal uncertainty.
Suggested Citation
Prayogo Laksono & Made Warka & Frans Simangungsong, 2026.
"Construction of restorative justice regulations in the integrated justice system,"
Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 79(1), pages 84-92, January.
Handle:
RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13397
DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v79i1.13397
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tasente Tanase to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.