IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/ojs13199.html

How Do Parents Support the Autonomy of Toddlers?

Author

Listed:
  • Maria-Madalina Coza

    (University of Bucharest - Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore how the parents of toddlers attending day care define, understand, and support children’s autonomy within the family environment. The research is framed within the constructivist–interpretive paradigm, in which reality is conceived as plural, socially constructed, and context-dependent. From this perspective, toddler autonomy is understood not as an objective and universal given, but as a phenomenon that manifests and acquires meaning differently according to interactions, cultural contexts, and parental representations. A qualitative, ethnographic design was chosen, as it allows for an in-depth understanding of parental practices and the meanings they attribute to the phenomenon under investigation. A total of 92 parents, representing 46 families (46 mothers and 46 fathers) of toddlers attending two day care centers in Bucharest, participated in three photovoice workshops conducted in June 2024. The findings indicate that parents do not conceptualize toddler autonomy as a singular ability, but rather as a complex and multidimensional process constructed within everyday and relational contexts. The analysis of the identified dimensions—practical and functional autonomy, emotional, cognitive, and relational autonomy, participation in family life, environmental exploration, and risk-taking—confirms the specialized literature regarding the progressive and interactional nature of early autonomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria-Madalina Coza, 2025. "How Do Parents Support the Autonomy of Toddlers?," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 76(1), pages 1-28, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13199
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v76i1.13199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/13199
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v76i1.13199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tasente Tanase to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.