IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/ojs13119.html

Appropriateness of Project-Based Learning- Students' Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Mihaela Stoica

    (University of Bucharest, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences)

Abstract

This paper investigates students’ perceptions of Project-Based Learning (PBL) as a teaching approach and its implementation in classroom settings. As an active, student-centred teaching approach, PBL instruction emphasizes learner engagement, autonomy, and real-world application of knowledge. This method might be an appropriate option in today’s school background as it places the student and their interests in the centre and encourages them to actively participate in the learning process. The study examines how students experience and evaluate PBL in terms of motivation, participation, and the development of essential competences such as critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, and communication. We analyse in this article students’ perceptions of PBL usage in the classroom and the extent to which this teaching approach might be an appropriate solution to the challenges that students have to face due to the continuous technological, economic and societal changes, among other active learning approaches. The results provide insight into how PBL can enhance students’ motivation to learn and develop collaboration and competences which better prepare students for future academic and professional demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Mihaela Stoica, 2025. "Appropriateness of Project-Based Learning- Students' Perspective," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 74(1), pages 21-34, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13119
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v74i1.13119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/13119
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v74i1.13119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:ojs:13119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tasente Tanase to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.