Author
Abstract
Education is founded upon the instruction process and its outcomes, commonly called learning outcomes. The underlying foundation of this entire process is the brain. Neuroscience encompasses the study of brain function, including the intricate processes involved in human learning. It also investigates the factors that contribute to variations in learning abilities among individuals. Therefore, it is unsurprising that individuals engaged in educational science are highly interested in integrating the discoveries of neurosciences with educational theories of learning. Neuroscientific research has been conducted for approximately three decades. However, there has been a growing interest in integrating neuroscience and education in recent years. This is evident from the numerous articles published in books and scientific journals that explore the relationship between these two fields. Additionally, the integration of neuroscience into educational leadership presents both opportunities and challenges. Educational neuroscience posits that insights from neuroscience can enhance teaching in the classroom. However, there are practical and principled issues associated with educational neuroscience, which need to be addressed. Neuroscience is revealing to educational leadership that it is a social process, with the human brain being a social organ interacting with others in social contexts. Incorporating neuroscience into educational leadership has the potential to increase its effectiveness, but contradictory studies address the critical nature of this integration. The application of advances in psychology, behavioral economics, and cognitive neuroscience to study school leaders’ decision-making processes is a tantalizing area. Finally, it is essential that neuroscientific data and interpretations are rooted in education to be embraced by the education profession.
Suggested Citation
Stella Stiliadi, 2024.
"Neuroscience Contribution in Educational Leadership. Challenges and Perspectives,"
Technium Education and Humanities, Technium Science, vol. 7, pages 42-53, February.
Handle:
RePEc:tec:educat:ojs:10328
DOI: 10.47577/teh.v7i.10328
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:educat:ojs:10328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.