IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tcb/cebare/v19y2019i3p93-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The distortionary effects of sterilised reserve accumulation on domestic credit markets: Evidence from Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmy ApaaOkello
  • Beatrice K. Mkenda
  • Eliab Luvanda

Abstract

Some small open Least Income Countries embarked on rapid accumulation of foreign reserves in the wake of volatile capital inflows. Foreign reserve accumulation is one way of managing volatile capital flows. However, rapid and persistent accumulation is not only costly, but potentially distort the domestic financial markets, especially when it is financed by sterilisation. This study investigates the potential distortions on commercial bank lending in Uganda. Our empirical results show that sterilised reserve purchases crowd-out bank lending. The crowding-out effect is persistent even when bank capitalisation and shifts in monetary policy regimes are controlled for, which raise important policy implications. The objective of sterilisation is to maintain the prevailing stance of monetary policy. However, when it alters the prevailing stance of monetary policy and consequently the direction of the impact of policy as the empirical result has shown, then sterilised reserve purchases violate the "impossible trinity" i.e. it weakens the monetary authority's control over domestic monetary conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmy ApaaOkello & Beatrice K. Mkenda & Eliab Luvanda, 2019. "The distortionary effects of sterilised reserve accumulation on domestic credit markets: Evidence from Uganda," Central Bank Review, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, vol. 19(3), pages 93-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:tcb:cebare:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:93-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/central-bank-review/vol/19/issue/3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tcb:cebare:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:93-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge or the person in charge or the person in charge or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tcmgvtr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.