IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/wjabxx/v26y2025i4p729-748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Bank Governance Mechanisms and Financial Report Lag Affect Audit Quality?

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Anaba
  • Rabiatu Kamil
  • Kingsley Opoku Appiah

Abstract

In the aftermath of banking failures in Africa, the survival of firms has thus been placed with the application of good corporate governance practice and the oversight role of internal and external auditors. This study examines whether audit quality is related to corporate board of directors and financial reporting timeliness in the context of developing countries. Using sample data from 21 universal banks in Ghana and 31 commercial banks in Kenya for the periods 2010 to 2019. The study employs the Generalized Least Square(GLS), using fixed effect to estimate the relationships. The empirical results document that board size, average 9, and board independence, 59% on average, increase audit quality in Africa. However, the relationship between board gender and audit quality is not significant. Financial report lag is not significant to audit quality in Africa. However, financial report lag in Kenya is negative and significant to quality audit. Our findings recommend that commercial banks in Africa should implement policies that would increase the size of their boards and the number of independent directors to enhance maximum benefits from good corporate governance practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Anaba & Rabiatu Kamil & Kingsley Opoku Appiah, 2025. "Do Bank Governance Mechanisms and Financial Report Lag Affect Audit Quality?," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 729-748, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:wjabxx:v:26:y:2025:i:4:p:729-748
    DOI: 10.1080/15228916.2024.2400034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15228916.2024.2400034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15228916.2024.2400034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:wjabxx:v:26:y:2025:i:4:p:729-748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/wjab20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.