IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vhimxx/v46y2013i4p220-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Large- N and Small- N Analyses: Historical Comparison of Thirty Insurgency Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Paul
  • Colin P. Clarke
  • Beth Grill
  • Terrance Savitsky

Abstract

The authors study the 30 insurgencies occurring between 1978 and 2008 using four methods crossing the qualitative/quantitative divide. The four approaches are narrative, bivariate comparison, comparative qualitative analysis, and K-medoids clustering. The quantification of qualitative data allows the authors to compare more cases than they could "hold in their heads" under a traditional small- n qualitative approach, improving the quality of the overall narrative and helping to ensure that the quantitative analyses respected the nuance of the detailed case histories. Structured data-mining reduces the dimensionality of possible explanatory factors relative to the available observations to expose patterns in the data in ways more common in large- n studies. The four analytic approaches produced similar and mutually supporting findings, leading to robust conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Paul & Colin P. Clarke & Beth Grill & Terrance Savitsky, 2013. "Between Large- N and Small- N Analyses: Historical Comparison of Thirty Insurgency Case Studies," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 220-239, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:vhimxx:v:46:y:2013:i:4:p:220-239
    DOI: 10.1080/01615440.2012.732008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01615440.2012.732008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01615440.2012.732008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vhimxx:v:46:y:2013:i:4:p:220-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vhim20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.