IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/veecee/v28y2026i2-3p277-305.html

Trust, gut feeling, and life cycle assessment: angel approaches to sustainability impact assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Meike Siefkes
  • Kimberly Lahr

Abstract

This study assesses business angels’ approaches to sustainability impact assessments through a principal–agent lens. Interviews with 20 angels shed light on different frameworks and tools, as well as the drivers, challenges, and temporal aspects underlying angels’ integration of sustainability impact assessments. While some angels implement systematic sustainability impact assessments throughout the entire investment process, others consciously decide against adopting such approaches and rely on their gut feeling. A third group acknowledges the need for more applicable tools but is hindered by data and resource limitations, as well as a lack of suitable methodologies. Based on extant literature and the empirical findings, a framework for angel sustainability impact assessment is presented. These findings further support the importance of sustainability knowledge for investors. Principal–agent theory is modified to account for context- and time-specificities. Recommendations for future research and practice are made as well as contributions to the green entrepreneurial finance literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Meike Siefkes & Kimberly Lahr, 2026. "Trust, gut feeling, and life cycle assessment: angel approaches to sustainability impact assessments," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2-3), pages 277-305, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:28:y:2026:i:2-3:p:277-305
    DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2026.2613795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13691066.2026.2613795
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13691066.2026.2613795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:28:y:2026:i:2-3:p:277-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TVEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.