IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/veecee/v27y2025i4p489-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate issues in portfolio investment decisions: a comparison of Private equity and venture capital

Author

Listed:
  • Jörn Block
  • Lena Benz
  • Helmut Krämer-Eis
  • Antonia Botsari
  • Frank Lang
  • Filip Mandys

Abstract

Private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) firms increasingly consider climate issues in their portfolio investment decisions. However, what are the underlying motives and which exact consideration strategies are employed? Based on the responses of 479 VC and 215 PE fund managers from two large surveys carried out in 2021, four motives emerge: ethical responsibility, responding to external stakeholders, product differentiation, and portfolio performance. Responding to external stakeholders and portfolio performance motives matter more to PE firms, while the product differentiation motive is more important for VC firms. No difference is found with respect to ethical responsibility as a motive. Regarding climate consideration strategies, screening strategies (positive and negative) are the most popular. Differences between VC and PE firms exist, and the motives to consider climate issues have an impact on the strategies employed. The implications for policymakers and the entrepreneurial finance sector are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jörn Block & Lena Benz & Helmut Krämer-Eis & Antonia Botsari & Frank Lang & Filip Mandys, 2025. "Climate issues in portfolio investment decisions: a comparison of Private equity and venture capital," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 489-519, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:27:y:2025:i:4:p:489-519
    DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2024.2351218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13691066.2024.2351218
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13691066.2024.2351218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:27:y:2025:i:4:p:489-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TVEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.